I have three of these, one came with a 6CH CM651 and two separate. I did a range test with all three and one Spektrum. I installed them all on the same quad, in the same position, with the two antennas in a straight line, and my DX6i in range check mode. All three Redcon have consistent link up to more than 80 steps (about 88 meters with my step) and started being intermittent after that, between 83 to 87 steps. I even hovered the quad from 70 steps in range check mode. Not bad at all considering that Spectrum requirement is to have total control from 30 steps. Is true that Spectrum in the same conditions went solid up to 105 steps and was intermittent at 110 steps but comparing the price Redcon is a winner from the range point of view. I flew the quad with the least sensitive one at full power after that with no issues. Now the bad news. One of the three has a hard time binding and connecting. I bond them using the CM651 and the main receiver LED came on solid waaay before the satellite. It take between 30 to 50 seconds to bind. Once bond, it takes a long time to get a solid LED at power up, can take anywhere between 10 to 15 seconds. Once connected it seems to work fine but I'm a bit scared to use the affected one. So two out of three are ok, one I'm not sure. Maybe BG team can give an opinion?

I have three of these, one came with a 6CH CM651 and two separate. I did a range test with all three and one Spektrum. I installed them all on the same quad, in the same position, with the two antennas in a straight line, and my DX6i in range check mode. All three Redcon have consistent link up to more than 80 steps (about 88 meters with my step) and started being intermittent after that, between 83 to 87 steps. I even hovered the quad from 70 steps in range check mode. Not bad at all considering that Spectrum requirement is to have total control from 30 steps. Is true that Spectrum in the same conditions went solid up to 105 steps and was intermittent at 110 steps but comparing the price Redcon is a winner from the range point of view. I flew the quad with the least sensitive one at full power after that with no issues. Now the bad news. One of the three has a hard time binding and connecting. I bond them using the CM651 and the main receiver LED came on solid waaay before the satellite. It take between 30 to 50 seconds to bind. Once bond, it takes a long time to get a solid LED at power up, can take anywhere between 10 to 15 seconds. Once connected it seems to work fine but I'm a bit scared to use the affected one. So two out of three are ok, one I'm not sure. Maybe BG team can give an opinion?

I have three of these, one came with a 6CH CM651 and two separate. I did a range test with all three and one Spektrum. I installed them all on the same quad, in the same position, with the two antennas in a straight line, and my DX6i in range check mode. All three Redcon have consistent link up to more than 80 steps (about 88 meters with my step) and started being intermittent after that, between 83 to 87 steps. I even hovered the quad from 70 steps in range check mode. Not bad at all considering that Spectrum requirement is to have total control from 30 steps. Is true that Spectrum in the same conditions went solid up to 105 steps and was intermittent at 110 steps but comparing the price Redcon is a winner from the range point of view. I flew the quad with the least sensitive one at full power after that with no issues. Now the bad news. One of the three has a hard time binding and connecting. I bond them using the CM651 and the main receiver LED came on solid waaay before the satellite. It take between 30 to 50 seconds to bind. Once bond, it takes a long time to get a solid LED at power up, can take anywhere between 10 to 15 seconds. Once connected it seems to work fine but I'm a bit scared to use the affected one. So two out of three are ok, one I'm not sure. Maybe BG team can give an opinion?

Seems to be a great receiver. Very small in size so great for those limited space builds. For those running a Naze32 flight controller, I had problems binding the receiver to my DX6i using Cleanflight. Instead, I had an old CC3D FC lying around so tried to bind through that and OpenPilot first which did the trick, I then transferred the receiver over to the Naze32 with no problems. Hope this helps.

Seems to be a great receiver. Very small in size so great for those limited space builds. For those running a Naze32 flight controller, I had problems binding the receiver to my DX6i using Cleanflight. Instead, I had an old CC3D FC lying around so tried to bind through that and OpenPilot first which did the trick, I then transferred the receiver over to the Naze32 with no problems. Hope this helps.

Seems to be a great receiver. Very small in size so great for those limited space builds. For those running a Naze32 flight controller, I had problems binding the receiver to my DX6i using Cleanflight. Instead, I had an old CC3D FC lying around so tried to bind through that and OpenPilot first which did the trick, I then transferred the receiver over to the Naze32 with no problems. Hope this helps.